<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Palatinate &#187; Stage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.palatinate.org.uk/content/indigo/stage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk</link>
	<description>Durham's Official Student Newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:51:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>42nd Street</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/42nd-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/42nd-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=7637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When waiting in the Caedmon Hall I had high expectations of 42nd Street from its glamorous publicity and the knowledge that the production had been in rehearsal for around two months. This tap-centred musical depicts the story of a young, naive Peggy Sawyer, (delightfully portrayed by Sarah Peters) who stumbles into the auditions for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When waiting in the Caedmon Hall I had high expectations of 42nd Street from its glamorous publicity and the knowledge that the production had been in rehearsal for around two months. This tap-centred musical depicts the story of a young, naive Peggy Sawyer, (delightfully portrayed by Sarah Peters) who stumbles into the auditions for the play Pretty Lady. Inadvertently challenging the once famous Dorothy Brock (Hannah Cope), Peters presents the progression of a chorus girl into a star, guided by her director and later love interest Julian Marsh (David Stodel).<br />
The metadramatic nature of the musical allowed for creativity on the directors’ behalf which was taken up wholeheartedly by Jonnie Grande and John Hall. The performance was very visually effective with imaginative use of lighting and an array of costumes which worked effectively with choreography to develop atmosphere in different scenes, seen for example in the silhouetted dance behind a screen.<br />
The show witnessed another stunning performance by Peters with accuracy in her role and notable character progression through the second half whereby her rendition of “42nd Street” was well directed to echo Cope in expression and mounting confidence. Cope portrayed a convincing diva, supported by a powerful voice, giving a strong impression in her first production with Durham Theatre. Some of her characterisation however bordered on too melodramatic, taking away from the authenticity of her role; a criticism which is more concerned with the director. Applause must go to Stodel who gave a consistently charismatic performance with sincerity of character throughout showing undeniable talent. Joe Childs’ emotive rendition of “Lullaby on Broadway” was successfully carried out and Sian Dolding portrayed an enthusiastic Maggie with an appropriate maternal aspect. It would be impossible not to mention here the comic flair of Dave Jenkins. Mincing on stage and proclaiming “Dancing is my life!” he naturally brings something to the cast, often proving a distraction from the main happenings on stage.<br />
A criticism which must be noted however was the volume of the band. Certain cast members were forced to shout their lines to be heard and some lines were drowned out altogether; something which was frustrating for the audience throughout the performance. This was unfortunate as the musical director Seth Miall showed aptitude in his work with the cast but this did bring down the professional image of the play.<br />
The choreography was undeniably impressive; however the choreographers (Emma Cave and Megan Clayton) needed to recognise the size and limitations of their cast. Some of the dances, particularly those that incorporated the whole chorus appeared too ambitious for a college cast, some of whom had never danced before. Their hard work was clearly seen in the performance of the cast, nevertheless the complexity of some of the routines lacked accuracy which was emphasised by the nature of tap, whereby the effect is not only visual but audible. Some of the dances thus appeared cluttered and mainly led by the core chorus girls. The final routine however had more precision and much higher energy producing a strong penultimate song.<br />
The five main chorus girls (Clare Reavey, Adele Pope, Catherine Scutts, Rachel Argent and Laura Warton) all deserve special mention for their talent and accuracy in several numbers. The choreography was outstanding, tailored to their abilities and executed neatly.<br />
The support and enthusiasm of the whole chorus was evident throughout and really uplifted the musical as a whole. The dedication of the entire cast and crew to pull off such an ambitious production was clear and worthwhile, resulting in a fantastically enjoyable performance on all fronts. My expectations were met, and despite occasional weaknesses, the whole team demonstrated aptitude worthy of commendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/42nd-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking at the intricate world of theatre criticism&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/looking-at-the-intricate-world-of-theatre-criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/looking-at-the-intricate-world-of-theatre-criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=7633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crritic!” Estragon famously yells “with finality” in his comic – or is it serious? – argument with Vladimir in Waiting for Godot. It is the insult to end all insults. And deeply insulted Vladimir seems to be. It puts an end to that phase of their banter and elicits many a laugh amongst the audience, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crritic!” Estragon famously yells “with finality” in his comic – or is it serious? – argument with Vladimir in Waiting for Godot. It is the insult to end all insults. And deeply insulted Vladimir seems to be. It puts an end to that phase of their banter and elicits many a laugh amongst the audience, who might perchance turn slightly, trying to catch a glimpse of any man silently slipping his pencil and paper out of sight and mind as he wonders whether his kind really is hated that much. After all, who would put up his hand and volunteer to wear the badge that says ‘critic’ in the theatre, concert hall or cinema, when it could equally say ‘person who values own opinions highly’? Or outside these establishments, for that matter, especially when the adjectival equivalent has synonyms like ‘perpetually unsatisfied with everything’ or ‘pedantic old bastard’? Not Vladimir.<br />
Unappealing connotations aside, is this insult justified? And if it is, isn’t it still a joke for Beckett, revelling in his own wit? I can see him now, the old Irish great in heaven (for some reason the image is in black and white), sitting and smoking (most likely) and watching with childish glee. And what does he see? He sees literati and critics alike feebly flailing, writhing and wrestling with his remark. They are anxious because a tiny little part of each of them thinks he is right to be serious, and they want him to be joking or else their work is, well… somewhat undermined.<br />
It is true that one cannot simply give condemning judgments of a piece of theatre alone, and anyone who does so deserves to be insulted. But if a satisfactory explanation is handed over in the same package, Estragon’s insult becomes unjustified. Then again, despite the intricacy of theatre criticism’s subject, it is written largely for the masses to read in the paper over breakfast, mug of coffee in hand, so in many ways it works like an advert. It is not for cast and crew to use as an additional set of director’s notes after the first performance, though you could be fooled into thinking otherwise. If the review is good, said breakfast-time-peruser might perchance twaddle up to London to see the thing for themselves.<br />
So, the reviewer’s duty is not to the theatre or producer, the director or the actors; it is to the good old British public – or the students of Durham for us. He has to write something short and sweet (or savoury, if the play is not so hot). You might wonder why I emphasise “has”. It is because in Durham reviewers are allocated plays on a first come, first served basis. In Palatinate English, this means that said person who comes first will supposedly produce a review of an appropriate length on the right day (professional critics leave the theatre at 10.30 pm and have to hand in their reviews ninety minutes later so it can all go to press on time, don’t you know, so really there’s no excuse).<br />
Reviews that don’t materialise have two rather unnerving effects. Firstly, stage editors become abnormally irate, they go very quiet, become sullen, sulky, ghostly pale – a bit like Edward Cullen. Then they miraculously procure a review from an unknown corner of Durham at no small effort. As I write, their cries of frustration are filling the Palatinate office, and I’m learning several new and obscure expletives that are most certainly not suitable to be noted down here. Secondly, theatre companies who have put up two free tickets for the reviewer-ghost, despite being on a tight budget, morph into enraged animals – wolves larger than bears, I’ve seen them – and start hunting the stage editors. Which is no fun for them, as you can probably imagine. It seems to me that the best solution would be for the wolves and vampires that are the theatre companies and stage editors to join forces and ruthlessly hunt down said ghost-reviewers. After all, this is a reciprocal society &#8211; you give when you receive &#8211; and they both want the same thing: a review for their money.<br />
So, on to the review itself. Although a reviewer has a duty to support his argument, five words are enough; five sentences, too many. If he opts for the latter, no one will read it. What a waste. We don’t expect the review of the latest Florence and the Machine track or Tim Burton’s newest film to be riddled with minutiae with which only they can engage. Granted, it is interesting to have the odd article which is more penetrating than the rest, but if they’re all pushing the 700 word mark, no one’s going to make it to the end of anything. If they do, they will more than likely<br />
a) be involved in the show<br />
b) be a friend of cast/crew/reviewer<br />
c) be involved in serious procrastination<br />
d) have missed out the juicy stuff in the<br />
middle to get to the concluding pearls<br />
of wisdom.<br />
‘Why do you publish such long reviews then?’ I hear you cry in outrage. ‘It’s much easier to write a long letter than a short one’ is my answer, and a problem which, with a little time and perseverance from reviewers, can be fixed.<br />
The icing on this particular cake is that there would then be space to print the reviews which at present can only be fitted onto the website. But there is another dilemma: the anticipation of theatre critcism in Durham comes from the wrong people. And this is a little harder to resolve, for this paper, anyway.<br />
The quandary is that we go to press once a fortnight, during which time three or four plays will have blazed up on the stage of the Assembly Rooms and disappeared with equal rapidity. Puff. Just like that. By the time the review comes out the situation is this: cast and crew are just desperate to know how well they did, those who saw it might be curious to hear a second opinion, but the majority of people will discard it to the outer recesses of the mind, along with the last essay they wrote. So the people who might read a short review to help them decide whether to see the thing or not are out. Those readers that remain want something wordy, difficult when these three or four shows are all vying equally for a chance of journalistic glory.<br />
Having decided that there’s not a lot that can be done about this, you might think that my opening up the debate to the floor is a bit pointless. I thought so at first, anyway. Earlier I said that the reviews were waited for by the wrong people. I should rephrase that. They are waited for by different people. We aren’t in London, and this isn’t a national paper. So perhaps we should just embrace it as yet another of those quirky Durham bubble things. And anyway, you probably shouldn’t take my opinion too seriously – after all, I  am a critic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/looking-at-the-intricate-world-of-theatre-criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Art</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=7628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watching Peculius Stage&#8217;s production of Yasmina Reza&#8217;s ART, many will have remembered the
over-used idiom &#8220;There&#8217;s no accounting for taste&#8221; more than once. Three radically different yet
equally excellent actors with unusual dynamics entertained the Assembly Room audience with such
effortlessness, outraged wit and juicy malignity, that one could have easily stopped bothering about
the play&#8217;s value itself which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching Peculius Stage&#8217;s production of Yasmina Reza&#8217;s ART, many will have remembered the<br />
over-used idiom &#8220;There&#8217;s no accounting for taste&#8221; more than once. Three radically different yet<br />
equally excellent actors with unusual dynamics entertained the Assembly Room audience with such<br />
effortlessness, outraged wit and juicy malignity, that one could have easily stopped bothering about<br />
the play&#8217;s value itself which serves perfectly as a blank slate for the artfulness of the actors but<br />
hardly reveals to the spectator much more than pieces of folk wisdom.<br />
In his Directors Note, Oscar Blustin courageously announced that when staging Yasmina Reza&#8217;s<br />
ART, he was attempting nothing less than creating something new in the familiar space of the<br />
Assembly Rooms. This seems wonderfully multi-layered, as the play is concerned with the very<br />
question about the value of art and the estimation of it. Thus, the décor might initially disappoint:<br />
Set in the pulsating centre of French bohemia and intellectualism, Paris, what should we have<br />
expected but an extensive supply of high-percentage booze, an interestingly arranged pile of<br />
jaundiced books and a pair of bumpy, yet stylish black leather chairs? As a spectator attuned to anti-<br />
naturalist staging, one might also raise one&#8217;s eyebrows about the cashew nuts the actors seem to be<br />
chewing and swallowing. Interestingly, the play&#8217;s props stand in direct dramatic contrast to the<br />
&#8220;white painting with white lines&#8221; Serge (Ben Salter) has purchased for 200 000 Francs, the value of<br />
which is hotly debated.<br />
Skillfully, the lighting is arranged as an interaction between full lighting and spots on each actor,<br />
establishing their representing entirely distinct stereotypes: the avant-gardist, the conservative and<br />
the sycophant. Ben Salter plays the former, Serge, with such tranquility and ease that when uttering<br />
smug self-proclamations (&#8221;Why am I being so absurdly virtuous?&#8221;), he elicits heartfelt laughter<br />
from the audience, far from condemning him as an idiotic buyer an overpriced monochrome &#8220;piece<br />
of shit&#8221;, as his friend Marc calls it. Especially in comparison to the other two, he brilliantly enacts<br />
moments of silence, punctuated by subtle mimic and expertly placed pauses.<br />
Marc, Serge&#8217;s antagonist optically as well as theatrically, is in no way inferior to him. Although<br />
some might feel that Ben Starr&#8217;s dramatisation of Marc&#8217;s emotional roller-coaster between frantic<br />
shouting, homeopathic-pill-popping and displays of ice-cold malignity could have done with a little<br />
more gradualism, however this is more a matter of character than actor. Ollie Lynes, though he had<br />
moments of appearing like an angry child of divorced parents trying to avoid collateral damage<br />
when the parties are fighting, he never let his role of Yvan slip into absolute pathos, even when<br />
tempted like in the surprisingly only palpability in the play, when he is accidentally slapped on the<br />
ear in the process of tearing his fighting friends apart.<br />
It is also Lynes&#8217; Yvan who opens ART for so much more than the question of &#8220;What is art?&#8221; which<br />
is loaded with cliché. In his explosively brilliant interpretation of Yvan&#8217;s emotional eruption before<br />
his upcoming wedding, Lynes reveals the emotional undertones of ART so that the spectator realises<br />
the question he should have been asking is too fundamental than to ever be time-worn: &#8220;What is<br />
friendship and how much honesty can it take?&#8221; Were Lynes&#8217; performance not as engaging and<br />
overtly pathetic, this question would drown in the plays&#8217; somewhat simplistic closing assertion of &#8220;I<br />
just want to be your friend&#8221; or, the opposite, pseudo-intellectual talk about deconstruction that<br />
certainly provides comedy, but can get on a non-art-historian&#8217;s nerves after the fourth mention.<br />
The director&#8217;s wish for &#8220;something new&#8221; might therefore have been fulfilled in quite a different way<br />
than he intended; The staging was as undoubtedly appropriate as the acting was fascinating, though<br />
hardly forward-looking. However, in times of minimalist staging and unconventional, sometimes<br />
bizarre acting, this is, however, something new. In times of monochrome works of art, the homely<br />
clicking-noise of three real and authentically spit-out olive stones being dropped on a plate after the<br />
friends&#8217; conciliatory olive-eating renders this staging of ART multicoloured and comes, in fact, as<br />
enough of a surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Die Fledermaus</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/die-fledermaus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/die-fledermaus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=7626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having never seen a full-length opera,  I approached Durham Opera Ensemble’s production of Die Fledermaus  with some trepidation.  Would I enjoy it?  Would I understand  it?  And, more importantly, would Strauss’ 1874 operetta about  nineteenth-century Viennese society speak to me, a twenty-first century  student?
 The answer  was yes to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Having never seen a full-length opera,  I approached Durham Opera Ensemble’s production of <em>Die Fledermaus </em> with some trepidation.  Would I enjoy it?  Would I understand  it?  And, more importantly, would Strauss’ 1874 operetta about  nineteenth-century Viennese society speak to me, a twenty-first century  student?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> The answer  was yes to all three questions.  <em>Die Fledermaus </em> offered a sublime combination of a strong plot, good acting and excellent  music that could not fail to provide a great evening of entertainment.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> I was hooked  from the very start when the orchestra opened with a rousing number  that visibly moved and excited myself and the people around me.   I then settled back and watched the comedy unfold as the characters  we are introduced to in the first act come together, unbeknownst to  each other, at the ball in Act II.  The artful confusion increases  in the prison in the final act before all is resolved, leaving the audience  with a shared feeling of satisfaction.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> Apart from  the compelling central relationship between Eisenstein and his wife,  Rosalinda (Will Davies and Katy Thomson), two particularly outstanding  performances must be highlighted.  Sam Morgan as Frank, the prison  governor, shone throughout, from stumbling around with a hangover that  had the audience in stitches to his superb background acting that threatened  to distract my attention completely away from the main action.   Rosy Rowell’s glorious overacting in the first act as the maid Adele  was an absolute joy to watch.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> Ned French  is to be commended for his all-too-brief appearances which extended  the humour of the operetta.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> The chorus  were directed very well and as such they successfully created the sense  of a busy and wild party with apparent ease.  The background acting  of the whole chorus was strong, which enhanced the professionalism of  the production.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> The decision  to have a female (Sarah Baillie) play the Russian Prince Orlofsky was  an interesting one.  Whilst the part was played admirably with  great gusto, I feel that the role would have been better played by a  male actor whose deeper tone would have provided a more amusing and  interesting contrast to the slightly feminised portrayals of the other  major male characters.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> The scenery  was well thought out, fitting in to the performance as a whole whilst  not being so dominant that it detracts from the action.  Along  with the costumes, it helped to convey the notion of the decadence and  the wastefulness of the aristocracy which is so important to this operetta.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> Artistic performance  is not the primary function of the Great Hall in Durham Castle and,  consequently, the nature of the seating meant that my view was not as  good as I would have liked (the silhouettes of people’s heads are  never as interesting as on-stage action).  However, opera is very  much an audible experience, so this did not undermine the production  too much.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> All in all,  everyone involved in <em>Die Fledermaus </em> ought to be proud in their achievement of instilling vitality into a  piece that, given its age, could have been dry.  It certainly gave  me a taste of the power of opera.  More, please.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/die-fledermaus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So We Think We Can Dance&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/so-we-think-we-can-dance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/so-we-think-we-can-dance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=6656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During my time at Durham, I have been fortunate enough to review a lot of theatre shows but never a dance show before. It was with pleasure then that when the oppurtunity arose, I leapt at the chance and for the most part I was certainly not disappointed.
The show started well, with some impressive solo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During my time at Durham, I have been fortunate enough to review a lot of theatre shows but never a dance show before. It was with pleasure then that when the oppurtunity arose, I leapt at the chance and for the most part I was certainly not disappointed.<br />
The show started well, with some impressive solo performances by Alanna Orpen and Samantha Shone respectively and on the whole,  the solo performances, whilst short, often gave a lot of bang for their buck. Group performances were also solid; the Jazz ones in particular were highly enjoyable, but some of the later dances were unremarkable which was a shame as it was evident even in these weaker performances that a lot of love and attention had gone into choreographing and producing the routines. Sadly though, a proportion of them simply failed to do it for me.</p>
<p>When they did work however, the group performances were the highlight of the night. I was impressed at the consciousness of effect when it came to colour in the Modern Jazz performance choreographed by Gemma Gillie who used green and white in a subtle but effective manner to help tell the story of the dance. Whilst it was undeniable that a foot or two went wrong throughout the show,  this could easily be put down to first night nerves and any mistakes which were made were soon forgotten by the audience thanks to some incredibly graceful movements and motifs such as a flower bud opening or a ring, which were a real joy to watch.<br />
Whilst dance is often associated with the feminine, the best performances of the night tended to be from the guys which was a real surprise. Comedy was present with Alex Eccles’ cheeky solo to the song ‘Banana Phone’  but special mention has to go to Derek Addai. His moves were simply phenomenal in their cleanness and quickness &#8211; that boy can certainly dance! Addai was a real crowd-pleaser and it doesn’t take much to figure out why &#8211; during his later dance with the Phoenix Crew, the pleasure and joy of performing was written all over his face and it was physically impossible not to smile along with him &#8211; the mark of a true performer.<br />
Obviously, the girls didn’t let their side down either. Jo Wright’s solo performance was simply enchanting in its expression of beauty and grace; you almost held your breath when watching her. Wright’s choreography too was superb; one of my favourite performances of the night was the Advanced Ballet who weren’t quite walking on air, but certainly weren’t far off. It was hard not to feel calm when watching their serene movements and they were helped by a very smart music choice by Wright whose self-awareness of how music and dance coincide bodes well for any future performances she may do. Whilst on the whole, the show was satisfying, there were some moments that were downright frustrating. Whilst every perforner has certain idiosyncrasies, some were immensely distracting such as an incredibly irritating arm which flailed around by one of the dancers in the Beginner’s Tap or the utter dourness of one of the gentleman in the Salsa who looked utterly bored at the prospect of dancing with a charming young lady &#8211; hardly the spirit of the dance. The Salsa performance also committed another crime, that of talking on stage. I found myself following a conversation rather than focusing on the performance which was a real shame as otherwise, the Salsa added some spice and it would have been nice if there had been more Latin dances or some ballroom added to the mix.<br />
Overall, the show was  definitely worth the watch. The range of performances was impressive, from ballet to a deliciously dirty Hip Hop performance. Whilst flaws were evident and an overall story or progression would have been nice, I sincerely hope that InStep will grace Durham with another show in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/so-we-think-we-can-dance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spring Awakening</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/spring-awakening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/spring-awakening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=6652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having never seen Frank Wedekind’s Spring Awakening, and knowing little about it other than its reputation as being highly controversial, I was expecting an evening of sex, lies and scandal. I was not disappointed.
Entering Leech Hall, I was struck by the intimacy of the venue. Directors Ben Salter and Hannah Shand made excellent use of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having never seen Frank Wedekind’s Spring Awakening, and knowing little about it other than its reputation as being highly controversial, I was expecting an evening of sex, lies and scandal. I was not disappointed.<br />
Entering Leech Hall, I was struck by the intimacy of the venue. Directors Ben Salter and Hannah Shand made excellent use of lighting and staging. Oscar Blustin’s very basic lighting design prevented the drama from overwhelming the small venue, always allowing the audience to feel close to the characters. This feeling was enhanced as the play was staged in the round. The cast not only coped with this very challenging set mimicked the claustrophobic community of provincial life in 19th century Germany, but also allowed the audience to watch the drama unfold from many different perspectives.<br />
The cast were all highly convincing and, although the momentum did appear to slow down in the play’s second half, they gave a truly moving performance. Callum Cheatle stole the show as Moritz Stiefel, a young man unable to cope with puberty and his own sexual awakening. His performance was never sentimental, and he moved from comic to tragic so smoothly that the audience couldn’t help but believe in him. His suicide at the end of the second act was so emotional that I received my own awakening when the house lights came back up.                 Similar praise must go to Greg Silverman playing Melchior Gabor, a schoolboy who rapes a young girl with whom he is in love. Despite the awful nature of his crime, Greg’s performance brought across the true complexity of his character’s psychology, to the extent that the audience felt genuine sympathy for him.<br />
Tash Cowley, playing Wendla Bergmann who is raped by Melchior, acted her similarly formidable role with great talent. She portrayed the childish naivety of Wendla realistically and movingly, particularly in her monologue following Melchior’s assault. Both performed with such maturity that it was difficult to believe that Tash and Greg are only freshers, and I look forward to seeing more from them in the future.<br />
Several roles were double cast and Nikki Jones, playing both Frau Bergmann and Frau Gabor, carried this off well. Her performance as Frau Gabor was especially emotive yet her use of voice as Frau Bergmann could sometimes render her hard to understand, detracting from an otherwise excellent performance. Matthew Urwin was cast as both Herr Gabor and Herr Steifel and, whilst these were smaller roles, gave a very memorable performance, particularly as the former. Niamh Murphy was also granted two roles, those of the nymph Ilse and the mysterious Masked Man. Whilst her performance as Ilse was delightfully seductive, I felt that her portrayal of the Masked Man lacked enough real flavour.<br />
Jonathon Bowers and Harry Bresslaw played Ernst Robel and Hanschen Rilow respectively, two schoolmates discovering their homosexual feelings for each other. Despite relatively little stage time, their performance was convincing, although their kiss could have had more passion. The roles of Martha Bessel and Thea, school friends of Wendla’s, were given to Catherine Good and Liz Smith respectively. Although smaller roles, Liz’s use of humour and Catherine’s memorable soliloquy on her parents’ abuse of her meant that they were by no means overshadowed.<br />
Although the second half for me lacked the energy of the first, the whole team tackled this unusual play very well and produced an excellent performance. The play dealt with very difficult topics such as rape, suicide and sexism, and congratulations should be given to the directors for providing a tasteful, sensitive and highly emotional performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/spring-awakening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blitz!</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/blitz-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/blitz-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=6645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First staged in 1962, the challenge Lionel Bart’s Blitz! sets for itself is to do justice to a period when “the city was on fire”1 in the musical medium without veering into melodrama or, worse, irreverence.  However, Blitz! exceeded all my expectations; with the raw allure of a play refreshingly stripped of the usual sparkling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First staged in 1962, the challenge Lionel Bart’s Blitz! sets for itself is to do justice to a period when “the city was on fire”1 in the musical medium without veering into melodrama or, worse, irreverence.  However, Blitz! exceeded all my expectations; with the raw allure of a play refreshingly stripped of the usual sparkling vacuity of musical theatre, it paid an uplifting and perceptive homage to the resilience and the admirable truculence of the British people.  The play’s debut in 1962 was deemed “massive” by Steven Suskin2 and the effect certainly endures in Collingwood’s robust production.</p>
<p>The close-knit cast effortlessly embody an intensity of communal spirit that only the experience of shared suffering can foster.  It is in the homely defiance of ‘Who’s this geezer, Hitler’ that truly conveys how unique this play is; it is stunningly grounded in the familiar, denouncing Hitler as a “nasty little b****** with a black moustache and we won’t have him here” with the charming irreverence of an indignant mother.</p>
<p>And it is in the indignant mother that the pivot of the play is found, Sarah Hollinshead dominating the stage with her deep soulful voice, which her son calls “the voice of doom” in its strength and maternal optimism, exemplifying Bart’s vision of the spirit of Blitzed London.  Hollinshead’s poise skilfully delineates the absolute dignity of the “Bake a Cake” mother, her domestic sublimation of her hardship, her “cakes were all heartaches” epitomising the resilience of the Home Front. The number “So Tell Me&#8230;Jack”, Mrs B’s fruitless appeal to her beloved deceased, movingly exposes the frustrated solitude of a single mother of five.</p>
<p>Special mention must be accorded to Hayley Parsons whose searing vocal peaks and nuance faultlessly conveyed her bittersweet fate as the Jewish Juliet to Gordon Taylor’s Cockney Romeo.  The exhausted romantic chestnut is reinvigorated not only in the tangible chemistry of the tentative lovers but in the contextual complexities of an anti-Semitic feud that fails to divide in a staunchly anti-Nazi community.  “As Long As this is England” resurrects the notion of defiance in community, the vast cast forming what seems one homogenous body of national pride as they sway heartily against the exterior threat.</p>
<p>Punctuated by deafening blasts that redefined the notion of contemporary relevance with the audience lurching in fright, the insubordination of the community refuses to abate, a blast followed cheerfully by the pulsating “Leave it to the ladies”.  The inclusion of a large host of child characters boosted and sustained the energy of the piece, their cheerful naivety being the basis of the black humour of “Mums and Dads”, a fiction that so starkly contrasts to the single parents and divided lovers of the war.</p>
<p>However, with the exception of the vibrant Blitztein women and the consistent characterization of the children, the acting on the whole was two-dimensional, lacking recognition of the gravity of the soldiers’ turmoil.  Gordon Taylor, although charming in the role of bashful lover, fails to convince as the traumatized returning soldier and there seems to be an implausible unconcern for the perils awaiting Harry Blitztein in combat on the part of his mother.  Their relationship however is most convincing when conveying generational friction, the timeless hypocrisy of the mother’s “be what you want to be” being exposed by her matriarchal concern.</p>
<p>Blitz! is an unfurnished gem in a sea of glossy musicals whose unrelenting energy and homeliness is truly cheering in this the most unlikely context – in one word, inspired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/blitz-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>42nd Street</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/blitz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/blitz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=6642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Come along and listen to the lullaby of Broadway&#8230;”
When waiting in the Caedmon Hall I must admit to having high expectations of 42nd Street from its glamorous publicity and the knowledge that the production had been in rehearsal for around 2 months. This tap-centred musical depicts the story of a young, naive Peggy Sawyer, (delightfully [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Come along and listen to the lullaby of Broadway&#8230;”</p>
<p>When waiting in the Caedmon Hall I must admit to having high expectations of 42nd Street from its glamorous publicity and the knowledge that the production had been in rehearsal for around 2 months. This tap-centred musical depicts the story of a young, naive Peggy Sawyer, (delightfully portrayed by Sarah Peters) who stumbles into the auditions for the play “Pretty Lady”. Inadvertently challenging the once famous Dorothy Brock (Hannah Cope), Peters presents the progression of a chorus girl into a star, guided by her director and later love interest Julian Marsh (David Stodel). The metadramatic nature of the musical allowed for creativity on the directors’ behalf which was taken up wholeheartedly by Jonnie Grande and John Hall. The performance was very visually effective with imaginative use of lighting and an array of costumes which worked effectively with choreography to develop atmosphere in different scenes, seen for example in the silhouetted dance behind a screen.</p>
<p>The show witnessed another stunning performance by Peters with accuracy in her role and notable character progression through the second half whereby her rendition of “42nd Street” was well directed to echo Cope in expression and mounting confidence. Cope portrayed a convincing diva, supported by a powerful voice, giving a strong impression in her first production with Durham Theatre. Some of her characterisation however bordered on too melodramatic, taking away from the authenticity of her role; a criticism which is more concerned with the director. Applause must go to Stodel who gave a consistently charismatic performance with sincerity of character throughout showing undeniable talent. Joe Childs’ emotive rendition of “Lullaby on Broadway” was successfully carried out and Sian Dolding portrayed an enthusiastic Maggie with an appropriate maternal aspect; both actors keeping consistently strong in all areas of performance. It would be impossible not to mention here the comic flair of Dave Jenkins. Mincing on stage and proclaiming “Dancing is my life!” he naturally brings something to the cast, often proving a distraction from the main happenings on stage.</p>
<p>A criticism which must be noted however was the volume of the band. Certain cast members were forced to shout their lines to be heard and some lines were drowned out altogether; something which was frustrating for the audience throughout the performance. This was unfortunate as the musical director Seth Miall showed aptitude in his work with the cast but this did bring down the professional image of the play.</p>
<p>The choreography was undeniably impressive; however the choreographers (Emma Cave and Megan Clayton) needed to recognise the size and limitations of their cast. Some of the dances, particularly those that incorporated the whole chorus appeared too ambitious for a college cast, some of whom had never danced before. Their hard work was clearly seen in the performance of the cast, nevertheless the complexity of some of the routines lacked accuracy which was emphasised by the nature of tap, whereby the effect is not only visual but audible. Some of the dances thus appeared cluttered and mainly led by the core chorus girls. The final routine however had more precision and much higher energy producing a strong penultimate song. The five main chorus girls (Clare Reavey, Adele Pope, Catherine Scutts, Rachel Argent and Laura Warton) all deserve special mention for their talent and accuracy in several numbers. The choreography of their dances was outstanding, tailored to their abilities and executed neatly.</p>
<p>The support and enthusiasm of the whole chorus was evident throughout and really uplifted the musical as a whole. The dedication of the entire cast and crew to pull off such an ambitious production was clear and worthwhile, resulting in a fantastically enjoyable performance on all fronts. I am pleased to say that my expectations were met, and despite occasional weaknesses, the whole team demonstrated aptitude worthy of commendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/blitz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guards! Guards!</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/guards-guards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/guards-guards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=6638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every girl wants a boy who can charm her socks off and tickle her funny bone. The same principle applies to reviewers and comedies; a good critic is more than ready to fall in love with the lead, we are poised to laugh at every joke and more consciously-willing than anyone else in the audience [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every girl wants a boy who can charm her socks off and tickle her funny bone. The same principle applies to reviewers and comedies; a good critic is more than ready to fall in love with the lead, we are poised to laugh at every joke and more consciously-willing than anyone else in the audience to be transported to a more amusing world. A play has to get many things wrong for a critic to truly dislike it.</p>
<p>Sadly for director Caz Brett, Guards! Guards! not only failed to hit this reviewer’s spot but was in the wrong region entirely, saved only by the skill of Ben Saunders’ technical team and the commendable acting of a select few. In fact, it is the natural charisma and well-honed comic timing of this handful that holds the play together and saves it from disaster.</p>
<p>Adapted from the eighth book of Terry Pratchett’s Discworld series, this standalone play should have had fans and newcomers alike roaring with laughter. Instead, with a cast of actors who could neither enunciate nor project, this was one comedy that left the audience dumbfounded rather than diverted.</p>
<p>Understudy Diccon Mellors struggled most with his role as Footnote, the play’s one man chorus-cum-commentator. Replacing Katie Logan, he lacked the timing, diction or vocal strength to do the role justice. Lines which should have raised laughter merely raised eyebrows while his late entrances and clumsy exits deserved every frustrated eye-roll. A better casting choice might have been Dave Spencer, who played an array of characters and whose stage presence and ability singled him out from others filling minor roles.</p>
<p>Thankfully, Katie Logan’s strong performance redeemed the show. Playing Lupine Wonse, the Supreme Grand Master who summons a dragon in a bid to take control of Ankh-Morpork city, Logan’s interpretation is an unusual one but her natural talent and superb timing gave the impression that she had been cast experimentally, and successfully, rather than filling in as an understudy for the absent Rob Richmond.</p>
<p>Another notable female was Alice Christian who played Lady Ramkin, an upper-class breeder of swamp dragons. The onstage chemistry between Lady Ramkin and the hero Captain Vimes, played by Karim Mariey, immediately endeared the pair to the audience with their hilariously overt flirtation. Although Mariey’s accent fluctuated from American to generic-Discworldian throughout the evening, Christian delivered a flawless and consistent performance in all respects.</p>
<p>Both actresses were aided by Emma Cunliffe’s excellent costume choices. Lady Ramkin’s wardrobe perfectly suited the character’s batty yet charming personality while the plain black robes worn by the Supreme Grand Master’s band of Elucidated Brothers created a mysterious yet simultaneously absurd atmosphere for this secret society of bungling magicians.</p>
<p>It is a shame that Cunliffe’s attention to detail was not shared by Brett who let her cast down with poor direction. One actor was half-hidden by a curtain while delivering a line and excessive movement from the five Brothers meant that each unnecessary gesture literally created ripple effects across their robes, distracting from those speaking, despite the lighting team’s faultless attempts to direct the audience’s focus.</p>
<p>Excessive noise was also an issue. While the Assembly Rooms is an excellent venue on the whole, the painful squeak of machinery meant that the audience was abruptly thrown out of Ankh-Morpork and back into Durham every time the background screen was lowered. Although this was clearly out of Brett’s control, the efficiency of her stage-hands was not. Irritatingly, black-outs were punctuated by shoes shuffling across floorboards and furniture clunking onstage.</p>
<p>For all its faults, Guards! Guards! still had the last laugh. Tom Eklid’s Carrot injected a sweet-natured enthusiasm as he enforced law and order in a city that had an established ‘licensed thieving quota’ with the Thieves’ Guild, creating much of the comedy in the first act. Ben Saunders and Evan Jones also brightened the second act as the inept duo Sergeant Fred Colon and Corporal Nobby Nobbs, bringing spark and energy to the stage.</p>
<p>With a great script, an excellent technical team and some truly talented actors, this performance of Guards! Guards! had a dragon’s hoard of potential but failed to generate the laughs it promised. This is one reviewer who will not be asking for a second date in Discworld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/guards-guards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DDF &#8211; Saturday Night!</title>
		<link>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/ddf-saturday-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/ddf-saturday-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatinate.org.uk/?p=6633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The  idea of improvising a musical completely off the cuff and guided only  by audience suggestions strikes fear into the heart of many performers,  but not the talented sextet that make up Durham Improvised Musical.  The group comprises Ollie Lynes (who won the festival’s Best Actor  award), Ben Starr, Rebecca [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">The  idea of improvising a musical completely off the cuff and guided only  by audience suggestions strikes fear into the heart of many performers,  but not the talented sextet that make up Durham Improvised Musical.  The group comprises Ollie Lynes (who won the festival’s Best Actor  award), Ben Starr, Rebecca Collingwood, Michael Shaw, Nicola Jones and  Ben Whittle, along with their pianist Jo Cichonska.</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; color: #ff0000; font-size: small;"> </span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">In the group’s anniversary performance, the  audience were asked for just four things: a title, the title of a song,  an opening location and an interesting object. These, after a heated  debate, were to be ‘The Amazing Shoelace Adventure’, ‘Stop stealing  my energy drinks’, a 24 hour marriage clinic in Tijuana, Mexico, and  a crutch. Just your average musical then&#8230;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">What  followed was the tale of Jason, a ‘Bramerican’ (that’s British-American)  and his Mexican bride Hosanna Juan, who are on the verge of divorce  on account of his wife’s ambition to migrate to America, which wasn’t  at all reminiscent of West Side Story, which Rebecca Collingwood had  starred in at the start of term&#8230; Ben Starr lived up to his name as  the laugh-a-minute star of the show, taking on the roles of marriage  counsellor and Jason’s Bramerican buddy, Jimmy, the second half of  ‘J-squared’.  Hosanna’s parents are the owners of a shoelace  business, and Steven is the textiles student researching shoelaces (and  later Jason’s love rival). The crutch was an ‘ancient object’  he had bought at the market, which turned out to be of great value.  He unwittingly gives it as a gift to Hosanna, and Jason uses it to buy  her and the Juan family’s passage to the US.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Of  course they all lived happily ever after, but along the way there was  much sparkling wit, such as J-squared’s signature phrase “Cock to  crotch”, silky smooth vocal harmony in ‘We can work it out’, and  some eye-popping hip wiggling in ‘Stop stealing my energy drinks’.  Dramatic tableaux and medleys were used to great effect, showing off  the adaptability of the performers.  This crowd pleaser would certainly  be a hard act to follow. </span></p>
<p align="justify">
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">24 Hour Plays</span></strong></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">After  the hilarity that ensued from the Improvised Musical, the two 24 Hour  Plays struck a very different chord. The intrepid teams behind them  went head to head, with 24 hours to write, learn and perform brand new  pieces inspired by audience suggestions. First of all was ‘Forever  but Never’, a curious tale of a cheating husband, Giles Gate, who  plots to kill his blackmailing bit on the side, a Miss Collingwood,  but instead accidentally kills his wife with a car bomb. He seeks out  a psychic, The Great Saldini, to contact his wife in the afterlife,  via the magic Skype Ball. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">As  the plot unfolds, we learn that the now deceased Rebecca Gate has been  having an affair with Saldini all along. Saldini peppered the play with  innuendo, steering it away from being that little bit too experimental.  Then an Irishman suddenly appears (don’t ask me) bringing a box onto  the stage. It transpires that the box contains a gun-toting Miss Collingwood,  who proceeds to kill all of the remaining characters, sending them all  to purgatory to join Giles’ wife. They all go off for a steamy Jacuzzi  session, leaving Giles alone to sing ‘All by myself’.  The  irony was clearly not lost on the giggling audience, and the play went  on to win the judges’ award for the Best 24 Hour Play.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">The  second play, entitled ‘It Takes One to Know One’, was entirely different,  playing out as a celebrity fairytale panel show. Rapunzel, it seems  has decided to pull a Britney and shave her head. The format of using  an off-stage interviewer and putting each of the four panellists in  separate studios gave the piece a slightly stilted nature, but there  were still endearing moments to be found. Di Gruff (of Billy Goats fame)  portrayed palpable heartbreak as Rapunzel’s former squeeze, whilst  Specky the not-so-blind mouse perfectly emulated the spaced out druggie  of the Pete Doherty persuasion. Goldilocks had starred alongside Rapunzel  in ‘The Oatso Simple Life’, and came across well as the It-girl  fallen from grace, after a sex tape scandal involving Daddy and Baby  Bear. But it was ‘The Artist Formerly Known as Prince Charming’  who stole the show with his camp bitchiness, with one-liners such as,  “I wonder why they call her Snow White? Sniff, sniff”, and, “Sleeping  Beauty – date rape.” Despite the Prince’s efforts, this piece  did not seem to mesh together as well as ‘Forever but Never’, which  explains why it lost out on the awards front. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The DULOG  Caberet</span></strong></span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">The  DULOG Cabaret gave a fitting celebratory flourish at the end of the  festival, showcasing a wide array of talented singers, actors and dancers.  These ranged from regulars on the Durham Musical Theatre scene, to those  who were treading the boards of the Assembly Rooms for the very first  time. Jo Cichonska provided faultless piano accompaniment</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">The  breathtakingly dramatic opening act was choreographed by Maddy Mutch,  and was a sublime tango-ballet fusion to ‘Roxanne’ from ‘Moulin  Rouge’. The spot on pointe work of the dancers fitted perfectly with  the climactic music, and the use of red lighting was extremely atmospheric. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">This  was followed by the wonderful Jessie Keely’s perfectly acted rendition  of ‘The Life I Never Led’ from ‘Sister Act’, in which you could  almost feel the audience being won over by her vulnerability one by  one. We were treated to yet more dynamic dance in the form of a Blues  Brothers’ Medley, choreographed by Tamara Gates, which was performed  with real gusto, accompanied by a cheeky glint of the eye.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">A  trio consisting of the Nikki Jones, Rebecca Collingwood (of Maria in  West Side Story fame) and Rebecca Mackinnon then showcased their rich  vocal harmony and characterisation in ‘Bluer than you’ from the  musical, ‘A&#8230; my name is Alice’, winning over the crowd with their  portrayal of three women unlucky in love.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Emma  Cave performed an emotion-fuelled lyrical dance to ‘Easy as life’  from the musical ‘Aida’, once again leaving the crowd hanging on  her every movement. Sarah Baillie sang, ‘Maybe this time’ from ‘Cabaret’,  with raw emotion that had the audience rooting for her Sally Bowles.  This won her the Best Musical Performance award later that night.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Sarah  Peters’ ‘Surabaya Santa’ from Jason Robert Brown’s  ‘Songs for a New World’ was one of the comedy highlights of  the evening, as she lamented her loneliness as Mrs Claus. Her comic  typing was right on the mark, and gave her real entertainment value.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Cara  Parkinson performed, ‘Leave Your Troubles at Home’, a tap dancing  accompanied tune penned by Durham’s own Andrew MacFarlane. This piece  was one of the more typically cabaret style of the night, and Cara performed  it with panache. The ‘Alto’s Lament’ performed by Debra Lowe was  another comedy highlight, as she portrayed the chorus girl longing for  a melody. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">But  it was the ‘Rent’ medley that really brought the house down and  gave the final valedictory flourish. It was directed by Emma Butler,  and performed by a group whose charisma and hours of practice shone  through. This final piece of the Durham Drama Festival certainly lived  up to its name, acting as a true celebration of the manifold talent  that Durham students have to offer.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatinate.org.uk/indigo/stage/theatre-reviews/ddf-saturday-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
